« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Intial dyno results  (Read 8829 times)

Offline Brett Haviland

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6530
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #15 on: September 22, 2009, 08:45:52 pm »
OMG!!!


WOW OWWOOW WOWZZERS!
Logged
I like Colts.  Turbo Colts.

Offline Brett Haviland

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6530
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #16 on: September 22, 2009, 08:47:01 pm »
hrrmmmmmm


maybe its because 92 octane burns faster then 94 octane. 

We are talking about this in class today...
Logged
I like Colts.  Turbo Colts.

Offline daniel Dee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1881
  • Fully drivable
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2009, 09:01:33 pm »

531 hp 26.9 psi.....

NOW ADD 2.1 PSI and

581whp  29psi

Is that even possible???
« Last Edit: September 22, 2009, 09:10:31 pm by daniel Dee »
Logged
92 AWD TSI 5spd<br />Built motor ,AEM EMS, Arc2 cdi 1050cc&1000cc Staged injectors Billet S366 T4,top mount manifold.666 AWHP@39psi (RG Dyno 2010). New mods E85, BF cams, 72mm turbo, 70mm throttle body />90 TSI (gone), 95 TSI 5 spd sold, 93 Mazda 5sp(sold), 97 Acura 5spd Vtec 99 Audi A4 quad 5sp 2018 Civicturbo 6sp ktuner

Offline John Hartman

  • Senior Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17539
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #18 on: September 22, 2009, 10:02:58 pm »
lower octane fuel has a bit less energy per "bang" as its slower burning, but it controls ping/knock better, so you have to decide if you need the timing or the energy of the burn more.
Logged
91 Eagle Talon TSi 5spd awd.  GT-12, TriFlow Cams, 850s, Tial, JIC, Jackal, sticky rubber.
86 Merkur XR4Ti 5spd, rwd, turbo, 91,381km.  Original paint, heated leather. intercooled, big VAM, Full 3" exhaust, Cossie sway bar, 16" tires.
06 Mazdaspeed6 6spd awd, DISI turbo, heated leather HIDs, Corksport, Cobb, Konig, Centric...
2018 VW Golf Alltrack turbo Tornado Red, 6mt, some free mods

Offline Remi Raymond

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1974
  • In a 12 step program
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2009, 10:03:41 pm »
Quote from: Brett Haviland on September 22, 2009, 08:47:01 pm
hrrmmmmmm


maybe its because 92 octane burns faster then 94 octane. 

We are talking about this in class today...

Brett I would chalk the 15hp difference up to the margin of error of measuring things on a dyno.
On most cars there is a 5-10 hp difference per run. Dans car makes so much power, it makes sense that from one day to another it's 15hp off.
Logged
They're like expensive pokemon... gotta catch 'em all.

Offline Remi Raymond

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1974
  • In a 12 step program
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2009, 10:05:29 pm »
Quote from: John Hartman on September 22, 2009, 10:02:58 pm
lower octane fuel has a bit less energy per "bang" as its slower burning, but it controls ping/knock better, so you have to decide if you need the timing or the energy of the burn more.

 I thought higher octane burned slower.
 In fact i'm pretty sure on that - it's how it prevents knocking, by having the release of energy occur over a larger timeframe, preventing drastic and sudden increases in cylinder pressures.
Logged
They're like expensive pokemon... gotta catch 'em all.

Offline Zach Holt

  • Senior Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3625
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2009, 10:43:32 pm »
Quote from: Lowell Foo on September 22, 2009, 04:25:15 pm
All fixed up and 666whp  :o

I only see a 581hp sheet. post the 666 ;)
Logged
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi
Then google.
Then read old postings about it.
Then ask.

Offline Kristopher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 964
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2009, 11:18:00 pm »
Quote from: daniel Dee on September 22, 2009, 09:01:33 pm
531 hp 26.9 psi.....

NOW ADD 2.1 PSI and
581whp  29psi

Is that even possible???


wow, super inefficient at anything under 27psi by the sounds of it...if you can call 531awhp inefficient.
Logged
Kristopher

Offline Jason Harwood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2507
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #23 on: September 23, 2009, 06:38:51 am »
Higher Octane burns slower.
Logged
88' MX6 Turbo - 14.2 @ 97.51MPH
94' MX6 V6 - 13.9 @ 96.7MPH
93' Civic Turbo - 14.7 @ 90MPH (bad tune)
90' Civic SI - Auto-X Machine
97' Eclipse GSX 13.6 @ 105MPH
96' Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo
97' Acura EL 14.5 @ 98MPH
'02 Lexus IS300 15.125 @ 91MPH
97' CR-V Winter Beater.
04' WRB WRX STI

Offline Shawn Muskovic

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #24 on: September 23, 2009, 07:24:03 am »
Quote from: Kristopher Rozon on September 22, 2009, 06:09:14 pm
Dan, your car will now be referred to as The Beast

Track that thing, I want to see MPH!
:D
No it's nickname is now "The Devil" because it is red and makes 666awhp ;)
I got to drive it at full power after the dyno run while lowell was datalogging.  I am speechless!!!  I have never felt a car pull like that. ;D
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 07:27:39 am by Shawn Muskovic »
Logged
1995 Nissan 240 w/ 2JZ
1992 Talon TSI: 6bolt/4bolt, 16G Turbo, 3" Turboback, DSMap.......   Sold
www.racinggreed.com

Offline Brett Haviland

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6530
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #25 on: September 23, 2009, 07:29:53 am »
Im pretty sure john just made a typo.  Im almost 100% on higher octane fuel burning slower.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 09:46:03 am by Brett Haviland »
Logged
I like Colts.  Turbo Colts.

Offline Jason Harwood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2507
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #26 on: September 23, 2009, 08:22:16 am »
If they let his car pass tech at the tracK!
Logged
88' MX6 Turbo - 14.2 @ 97.51MPH
94' MX6 V6 - 13.9 @ 96.7MPH
93' Civic Turbo - 14.7 @ 90MPH (bad tune)
90' Civic SI - Auto-X Machine
97' Eclipse GSX 13.6 @ 105MPH
96' Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo
97' Acura EL 14.5 @ 98MPH
'02 Lexus IS300 15.125 @ 91MPH
97' CR-V Winter Beater.
04' WRB WRX STI

Offline Ryan Coft

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1973
  • Retired!
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #27 on: September 23, 2009, 10:00:55 am »
congrats Dan, thats clearly an efficient setup you have ;)
Logged

Offline Racing Greed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #28 on: September 23, 2009, 11:23:01 am »
666 run...

Actually made 665.9whp, need better exhaust to make more power!!!!!!!!!
Logged
RG RACING

www.racinggreed.com

Tel: 604.554.0170
Unit 110 - 1650 Broadway St
Port Coquitlam, BC
V3C 6P8
 
Like us on facebook & follow the shops developments and customer cars:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Racing-Greed/140448429329074

Offline Lowell Foo

  • Senior Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 878
    • Racing Greed
Re: Intial dyno results
« Reply #29 on: September 23, 2009, 11:28:37 am »
Dan's car made 653whp on 6 or 7 consecutive pulls.  Amazing consistency for a high powered setup.

As for the different pump gas octanes, the power difference had more to do with timing, and 525whp is a safe and slightly detuned power level on 94 octane.  Detuned on race fuel, the last two pulls were 649 and 648.
Logged
92 Laser AWD, 50 trim, 494whp
92 Talon AWD, 50 trim, 11.55 @ 127mph w/ 399whp.
90 Talon AWD, 11.40 @ 123 ~ 10 years ago.  Currently in storage.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
« previous next »